Over the summer, it occurred to me that History class should be like the hit television show Law and Order.
- Law – Investigate, Corroborate, Develop Case
- Order – Develop Case, Create and Defend Argument
So after noticing that many of my students were not using evidence on a prior assignment (using the Declaration of the Rights of Man), I created this assignment to reinforce the necessity of using evidence in history.
(OK, I also wanted to use this in class.)
Let’s be honest, Robespierre is guilty…but of what? The Committee of Public Safety needs to have a trial to restore the public’s faith in the French government. The charges against Robespierre MUST be absolutely legitimate and based upon the Rights of Man.
Use the Declaration to the Rights of Man to find what to charge Robespierre. Make sure you have evidence to support the charge! The stronger the evidence, the better the trial will appear to the public.
The Finished Product
You will be given an index card. [Edit: I created this GoogleDoc for students to complete this using.]
On the front, you must have the right that Robespierre is guilty of and a picture of how Robespierre broke it. On the back, you must have one or two strong pieces of evidence that supports the charge.
Slam Dunk Case = 5 Pieces of Strong Evidence
Solid Case = 4 Pieces of Strong Evidence
Rocky Case = 3 Pieces of Strong Evidence
We’ve Lost! = Less than 2 Pieces of Strong Evidence
This assignment did exactly what I wanted it to do – stress the importance of using evidence. Plus it got students to interact with the Declaration of the Rights of Man in another way (and possibly more meaningful way)!
I could have had students walk through the each others evidence and discuss what made for a compelling case…next year!
This year, students used their textbook to collect evidence against Robespierre, but I may seek out secondary sources for next year.